|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 28, 2013 7:41:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by xolta on Mar 30, 2013 21:16:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Albino Anti-Hero on Mar 30, 2013 22:51:05 GMT
I just realized, the movie hancock with will smith is nothing but a lame knock off of Garth Ennis' one-shot the Pro, but with a bum instead of a prostitute and less criticism of comic book morality. That's really quite pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 30, 2013 23:41:54 GMT
hancock is about race relations in america
|
|
|
Post by Spuvsy on Mar 30, 2013 23:52:21 GMT
shut up aorta
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 30, 2013 23:59:27 GMT
no u, i don't know how you could miss the incredibly obvious racial aspect
|
|
|
Post by xolta on Mar 31, 2013 0:06:41 GMT
Go to your room son.
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 31, 2013 0:27:32 GMT
a film that is literally about a black man who is rejected by society because he is in a relationship with a white woman, but it's not about race, oh no
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 31, 2013 0:27:52 GMT
seriously y'all are some willfully obtuse motherfuckers sometimes
|
|
|
Post by outhouseinferno on Mar 31, 2013 0:46:43 GMT
That doesn't happen in the movie. If you wanted to make the relation between him being black and damaging property/being reckless/being an alcoholic that's one thing, but nobody outside the three mains really knows about (and thus, can't care about) the relationship between Hancock and his previous partner.
And anyway if we wanted to see racial tension we could just go downtown (or make fun of sonoran lol)
|
|
|
Post by outhouseinferno on Mar 31, 2013 0:58:58 GMT
Also Hancock used to be something called "Tonight, He Comes", which was full of Egyptian mythological hints, was an R-rated melodrama about the same hancock helping/ruining a loser family, and was even worse than the Hancock movie we did get
Many of those hints did make it into Hancock, so it's even less of a case for making it a primarily race-based affair.
|
|
|
Post by xolta on Mar 31, 2013 2:23:18 GMT
a film that is literally about a black man who is rejected by society because he is in a relationship with a white woman, but it's not about race, oh no Aorta I dont want to do this but I have to demote you back t potato status.
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 31, 2013 6:51:37 GMT
That doesn't happen in the movie. If you wanted to make the relation between him being black and damaging property/being reckless/being an alcoholic that's one thing, but nobody outside the three mains really knows about (and thus, can't care about) the relationship between Hancock and his previous partner. And anyway if we wanted to see racial tension we could just go downtown (or make fun of sonoran lol) his homelessness and distrust for others in the beginning of the film is a direct result of being affected by racism in the past. except that we can analyse the movie that actually exists, not on what it isn't(that stuff was probably removed for a reason) you're really not into this whole 'thinking about art' thing, are you
|
|
|
Post by outhouseinferno on Mar 31, 2013 7:48:36 GMT
You could say that, but he's actually a separate 'superhero' species so I think his powers would take precedence over his race any day. His situation was also directly related to something powers-related that his wife bought up.
I was just adding the old script as a fun fact for others
I think it's more that people here have seen too much of what happens when race is bought up any time there's a remote chance it being relevant, thus ruining any chance of regular discourse and turning it automatically into tumblr social justice poop.
|
|
|
Post by i love my dead gay forum on Mar 31, 2013 8:30:29 GMT
dudes with superpowers aren't real. the main point is that he's a black guy who was discriminated against(attacked by a mob iirc) for being with a white lady. i dunno how you could think the movie isn't abour race when it drives the entire plot. i'm not being a tumblr thing, i'm pointing out overt themes in the movie(it was really just an offhand informative comment, i don't even like hancock all that much)
|
|